Metaphysics (3): Time and Person
Note: This is the third instalment in my comprehensive summary and an opinion piece of this book.
Time
For a change and its cause to occur (discussed in the previous instalment) time is an element definitely involved.
Not only in this but nearly everything that has to do with reality so it only makes sense to include it under metaphysics.
How fast does time pass though? Does it go in reverse? Or since time exists independently of events, can nothing occur while time passes?
Bringing back temporal properties has some value regarding these questions. An event yesterday has a temporal property of past while an event now has for present.
But the order does generally seem future, present and past.
Shifting gears, believing in the present moment as real is called presentism and this view is getting popular through meditation these days.
But the problem of this is obvious: how long or short is present exactly? A millisecond? A second? An hour? People say a moment but that doesn’t exactly tell how long.
We can only roughly gauge a moment to be one till the period we acknowledge as so.
But another problem also lurks. Is it possible for two spatially separated events doing simultaneously such as getting sunlight and the sun taking over eight minutes to reach you? Is that still the present ‘moment’?
Coming back to tenses, why is the past acknowledged as real while it would be considered false to say the future is real as well?
The rational answer for it: since the past was present and thus, a real event occurring in the timeline whereas the future is not present yet thus only a probable possibility that is to occur but is this true?
The ancients also had opinions on these and these might seem appealing compared to what has been discussed so far.
Aristotle would start from the genesis of change (big bang theory), changes and finally construct it into time. This is called Eternalism.
It simply means that the clock started ticking from genesis.
Read MoreBeing Alone and Pleasures
Society tells us being alone is bad. It’s considered to be synonymous with laziness, carefree, introverted, useless and so on.
Being alone to many or rather by society is seen especially as something we were forced into, not something we actively chose.
I mean, who would want to be intentionally alone right? After all, having friends is fun. We can talk, joke, socialize and do a lot of fun activities together.
Compared to being alone by ourselves where we are silently doing one activity that no one really knows nor is involved in.
You read a book on crime in your leisure time from your bedroom and no one knows. Of course, you can create a reading group and read together but you get my point right?
Sure, we can extrapolate activities done alone into a group event but they are still largely alone.
After all, even in a reading group, you still spend the majority of your time reading and comprehending the book after which you socialize the remaining finite time.
Being alone is often seen as the last option in a multiple choice answer.
Read MoreMetaphysics (2): Change and Cause
Note: This is the second installment in my comprehensive summary and an opinion piece of this book.
In the first essay, we have broadly discussed about an object, nature of circularity and whether a whole is greater than an individual part or its sum.
In this essay, we will be dealing with the nature of change and cause and its perspective from a metaphysics angle.
Changes
By change, I mean an object showing a different property than its previous one; whether that property can be recovered or not does not matter.
An irreversible change is something of a child becoming an adult and a reversible one is of lifting a child into the air and bringing them back on the ground.
Before furthering this topic, we will define a term. An event is something where there is at least some change involved which is opposite to a static nature.
Read MoreMy Problem with Hustle Culture
Hustle culture is considered good by some, great by few.
“It’s a good mindset. It helps us grow”, they say.
But perhaps there is some truth to this. After all, it is better to be focusing on a generally good goal over being completely aimless about life.
Perhaps it is better to serve society’s expectations and live an ideal career that brings value to society.
Read More